Why Students Should Have a Say in AI Technology

The US is finally getting back into the AI regulation game with the new AI Executive Order. It recognizes the risks posed by AI systems, such as wrongful arrests and biased fraud detection. However, the order fails to include an important group in education: students. Students are often early adopters of technology and have valuable knowledge and experience that decision-makers lack. It’s time for universities to establish student-led technology councils to empower students in decision-making processes that affect their education and future careers. These councils can provide fresh perspectives, bridge the gap between students and administrators, and address the technology needs and concerns of students. They can also promote transparency and accountability in the use of AI and technology. Critics may argue that students lack the expertise, but they are constant users of AI in educational settings. While universities should retain some control over technology, student technology councils can advise on responsible and meaningful use. Their input should be mandatory for technologies that directly or indirectly affect students. Council members should gather input from the student body, conduct research, and publish well-reasoned recommendations. University leadership should acknowledge and consider these recommendations in decision-making. Student technology councils would create a more inclusive and responsive environment in line with President Biden’s vision of equitable and participatory AI use. Students have long demanded more participation in decision-making processes, and student governance has been successful in some institutions. It’s clear that students are ready and willing to engage in the design and administration of their own learning, and technology should not be exempt from their input.