Uncovering the Origins of Racial Disparities in Entrepreneurship

The analysis of the racial disparities in entrepreneurship has often focused on the structural barriers that impede access to the resources essential for launching a business. However, a recent working paper authored by Professor David Robinson of Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business argues that specific psychological and social factors may also play a role in the early stages of the entrepreneurial journey, particularly for the Black community.

The paper, titled “Why Aren’t There More Minority Entrepreneurs,” authored by Robinson and Victor Bennett of the University of Utah, delves into the potential causes behind the disparities in launching businesses, with a particular emphasis on gender and racial differences.

According to Robinson, the investigation of racial discrepancies in startup activity has been a prominent focus in entrepreneurship research. However, in light of the events surrounding the death of George Floyd in 2020, the urgency of this issue was heightened. This prompted their collaborative efforts to delve into the matter.

The data underscores the stark reality: only 5% of the overall Black population are business owners, in contrast to the over 9% of white Americans who are entrepreneurs. While conventional wisdom attributes these differences to wealth disparities and limited access to capital, the researchers aimed to test the impact of race on potential entrepreneurs at all stages of their journey to establishing a company.

Expanding on the work of Bennett and Fuqua Professor Aaron “Ronnie” Chatterji, who had previously surveyed a representative sample of the U.S. population and gathered racial data, the authors aimed to determine the likelihood of Black individuals to conceive business ideas, their confidence in the potential success of these ideas, and their subsequent progression to realizing these concepts.

Survey responses from 51,827 individuals between 2015 and 2017 revealed that while Black individuals were more inclined than their white counterparts to consider a business idea, they were less likely to share it with friends. This discrepancy became even more apparent when compared to their willingness to discuss the idea with expert strangers. Moreover, Black individuals who contemplated a business idea and shared it with friends were less likely to bring it to fruition, yet there were no significant differences in business formation when they sought the input of expert strangers.

The findings of the research suggest that the racial disparities in entrepreneurship predominantly surface during the early stages of the entrepreneurial journey, particularly when the idea is shared within one’s immediate circle. Notably, the data does not definitively pinpoint the root cause of this disparity, leaving open the possibility of a fear of failure, a knowledge gap within the community, or a stronger conviction to seek advice from outside the immediate circle.

Robinson and his team also highlighted that the data revealed a wealth divide within the Black community, with high-income respondents who consulted with expert strangers having a similar business formation rate to that of white individuals. However, this trend was not mirrored among low-income Black survey participants, further underscoring disparities in access to information and financing.

The research presents opportunities for potential policy interventions to address these disparities in entrepreneurship, with Robinson suggesting that inexpensive measures like mentorship and community-building programs could provide entrepreneurs with the initial insights they need before advancing to costlier stages. Highlighting the effectiveness of programs such as the Kauffman Foundation’s 1 Million Cups, where aspirants engage with established business experts, Robinson sees great potential in these initiatives as a means to ameliorate the structural inequalities in the entrepreneurial landscape.

In conclusion, the insights gleaned from the study provide policymakers with valuable information on how they can facilitate a more inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem. By promoting more advice-seeking channels, low-cost interventions may be the key to making a meaningful impact on entrepreneurial outcomes in historically underrepresented communities.

Reproduction of this article requires prior permission from Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. For additional details, please reach out to [email protected].