The municipality of Detroit has reached an accord in a lawsuit with Robert Williams, consenting to remunerate him with the amount of $300,000 due to the erroneous allegation of shoplifting. Moreover, the city has pledged to revise the methodology by which the police employ facial recognition technology for the resolution of criminal acts.
The settlement, disclosed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Civil Rights Litigation Initiative at University of Michigan law school, marks a significant stride in addressing the inadequacies and racial prejudice linked with facial recognition technology. The lawsuit emanated from an incident in 2018, in which Williams’ driver’s license photograph was incorrectly identified as a probable match to an individual captured on surveillance footage at a Shinola watch store.
A segment of the pact entails that Detroit’s police force will be forbidden from carrying out arrests premised solely on facial recognition outcomes. Furthermore, they will not be permitted to execute apprehensions based on photo lineups produced from a facial recognition exploration. Instead, they will be mandated to integrate conventional investigative techniques to corroborate any clues furnished by facial recognition technology.
The declaration of the settlement ensues subsequent to Chief James White of the Detroit Police Department instituting novel policies concerning the utilization of facial recognition technology last August. These mandates stipulated that supplementary proof, apart from the technology, must validate a suspect’s involvement in an unlawful activity. Additionally, the agreement with Williams requires a reassessment of cases from 2017 to 2023 wherein facial recognition was implemented. Moreover, if an arrest was made devoid of independent substantiation, prosecutors will be duly notified.
The repercussions of the improper application of facial recognition technology can be severe for individuals who are inaccurately implicated in criminal offences. According to Phil Mayor, an ACLU legal professional, those accused based on a facial recognition examination often face coercion to plead guilty, particularly if they possess a criminal background. This underscores the significance of guaranteeing that the use of such technology is accompanied by rigorous precautions to avert its exploitation.
The resolution of Robert Williams’ lawsuit serves as a crucial reminder of the necessity to scrutinise the implementation of facial recognition technology in law enforcement. It represents a step in the right direction towards mitigating the perils of partiality and fallibility that are intrinsic to such systems. The commitment to re-evaluate past cases and embrace more stringent protocols illustrates the municipality’s commitment to upholding justice and equity in its criminal inquiries.
For the latest updates on this matter, you can follow Ed White on Twitter at https://twitter.com/edwritez.