Controversy Erupts Over LSE Event Discussing Hamas Misrepresentation

Helena Cobban’s talk at LSE on Hamas sparked controversy over claims media misrepresents the group. She coined “disrepresentation” to describe media distortion and justified Hamas’ actions under international law. The event faced protests, particularly from Jewish students, and calls to cancel it were ignored, with LSE emphasising free speech. However, critics condemned it as promoting extremist views.

Helena Cobban, the author speaking at the London School of Economics’ event “Understanding Hamas and Why that Matters,” faced backlash for stating that the media is “deliberately misrepresenting” Hamas. Speaking to students, she argued that corporate media has distorted Hamas’ actions, claiming early on that groups like Hamas “are not alone in Gaza in mounting a resistance.” This event was heavily scrutinised prior to its occurrence.

Cobban introduced the term “disrepresentation” to describe media distortion of Hamas. When asked by moderator Michael Manson if she considered “resistance” a factual term, she affirmed it, stating, “Resistance to occupation…is permitted under international law.” Cobban contended that media suppression contributes to public ignorance on the topic.

During the event, Cobban was asked for a clear condemnation of Hamas’ attacks on October 7 but struggled to clarify her stance. She asserted, “I am definitely prepared to condemn all attacks that violate international humanitarian law,” but justified many of Hamas’ actions as targeting military objectives.

A fellow attendee with expertise in demonisation accused Cobban of attempting to exonerate Hamas through her choice of words. The event attracted criticism from Jewish students and staff, with concerns raised that it might promote Hamas propaganda. Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely previously urged LSE to cancel the event, warning it might support a terrorist narrative.

Despite protests and complaints, LSE defended the event on the grounds of free speech. Various attendees expressed their discomfort with the event’s support for Hamas, calling it a troubling symbol of indoctrination. Protests occurred both outside the venue and within the community, indicating significant disagreement over the event’s legitimacy and content.

One protestor claimed, “LSE is actively working to sanitise the image of a terrorist organisation,” expressing a shared sentiment against the portrayal of Hamas at the event.

The LSE event featuring Helena Cobban elicited strong reactions for its perceived support of Hamas and its actions. Critics, including members of the Jewish community and Israeli officials, raised concerns about the event’s legitimacy and its potential to promote anti-Israel sentiment. Despite backlash and protests, LSE maintained its commitment to freedom of expression while facing scrutiny over its choices and the implications of hosting such discussions.

Original Source: www.gbnews.com