Chicago Decides to Discontinue the Use of Gunshot Detection Technology

The city of Chicago has officially announced its decision to terminate the utilization of ShotSpotter, a contentious gunshot detection system, by the conclusion of the year. This technology, which relies on an artificial intelligence algorithm and an array of microphones to identify gunfire, has faced significant criticism due to its inaccuracies, potential racial bias, and possible misuse by law enforcement.

The resolution to discontinue the use of ShotSpotter was made following the expiration of the city’s contract with SoundThinking, the company responsible for the public safety technology. Since its implementation in 2018, the city has invested a total of $49 million in the system. However, concerns regarding its effectiveness and impact on the local community have paved the way for its imminent cessation.

Central to the criticism of ShotSpotter is its fallibility, as it has been known to erroneously identify non-gunshot noises, such as fireworks or motorcycle sounds, as gunfire. This has led to needless and potentially contentious encounters between law enforcement and residents, particularly in predominantly Black and Latino neighbourhoods. Moreover, an investigation has revealed that ShotSpotter data was utilized as evidence in a murder case, which was subsequently dismissed by a judge due to insufficient corroborative proof.

In response to this decision, the office of Mayor Brandon Johnson has declared that Chicago will redirect its resources towards strategies and tactics that have proven to be more efficacious in addressing violent crime. This includes fostering collaboration between the community, violence prevention organisations, and law enforcement in order to create a safer environment for all inhabitants.

While the police department has expressed support for the technology, Mayor Johnson’s administration has made good on its electoral pledge to terminate the use of ShotSpotter. Mayor Johnson believes that the city must evaluate tools and programmes that can better enhance safety and trust within the community, rather than relying solely on controversial technologies.

This announcement has garnered approval from organisations such as the Stop ShotSpotter Coalition, which have advocated for an earlier discontinuation of the technology. They argue that investments in policing and technology have diverted resources away from more tangible support and solutions for those affected by gun violence.

With the ongoing decline in violent crime, the city’s decision to veer away from ShotSpotter is regarded as a move toward nurturing a safer and more inclusive environment. As Chicago transitions away from the use of this technology, it remains steadfast in its commitment to exploring alternative approaches that prioritise the well-being of its inhabitants.