In a contemporary society in which technology has effectively addressed the myriad challenges facing humanity, the question arises as to how individuals will occupy themselves. This inquiry is the subject of a recent treatise by Nick Bostrom, a distinguished philosopher at the University of Oxford. The discerning philosopher contemplates the possibility that if artificial intelligence progresses to the point of executing all economically beneficial tasks at negligible cost, or even assuming responsibilities such as childcare, what pursuits will remain for humans?
In this hypothetical “post-scarcity” utopia, the necessity for human labour would be markedly diminished. This notion echoes a forecast made nearly a century ago by John Maynard Keynes, who foresaw that future generations would only need to labour 15 hours per week. Although this prophecy has not entirely materialised, it is evident that average weekly working hours have substantially decreased in affluent societies. Individuals already allocate a significant portion of their waking hours to recreational pursuits and athletic activities. Should individuals benefit from sophisticated technology, they would be afforded the opportunity to explore experiences that transcend their current constraints.
However, it is imperative to acknowledge that even in a world characterised by technological advancement, the economic surge precipitated by superintelligence would still be constrained by tangible resources such as land. Furthermore, notwithstanding AI’s superiority over humans in various domains, tasks that enhance an individual’s prestige are likely to retain inherent value.
Moreover, beyond the post-scarcity world lies a “post-instrumental” realm, in which AIs would excel even in tasks such as childcare. These circumstances raise the poignant question of whether the staggering evolution of technology may rob humanity of its sense of purpose. While most individuals are likely to continue deriving enjoyment from activities imbued with intrinsic value, the possibility looms that challenges and adventures may eventually lose their appeal.
In light of these advancements, the veracity of the notion that humans possess “unlimited wants and desires,” as postulated by economists for an extensive period, remains to be ascertained. The advent of an AI utopia is poised to put this belief to the ultimate test. The implications of such a scenario are profound, and much rests on the outcome.
This thought-provoking publication by Nick Bostrom unfurls a panorama of prospects and potential challenges that may confront a world dominated by advanced AI. It impels us to ponder what constitutes purpose and contentment in a milieu where technological progress has rendered conventional tasks and vocations obsolete.
For further erudite insights into the foremost developments in the realms of economics, finance, and markets, discerning readers are encouraged to subscribe to Money Talks, an exclusive weekly newsletter proffered by The Economist.
© 2024, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on www.economist.com