The potential introduction of virtual reality (VR) technology in Scottish courtrooms is currently under review, with the aim of allowing jurors to experience crime scenes through high-tech simulations without physically leaving the courtroom. This innovative approach seeks to provide jurors with a more immersive understanding of crime scenes and could also be utilized for the training of forensic investigators.
At a recent event of the Scottish Police Authority, Fiona Douglas, the director of forensic services, discussed the potential use of VR in courtrooms. She highlighted its ability to allow jurors to immerse themselves in crime scenes and better comprehend biometric evidence in context.
The concept of using VR in courtrooms was further emphasized during the trial of Iain Packer at the High Court in Glasgow earlier this year. In this case, the consideration of VR headsets could have provided jurors with a virtual representation of the crime scene, offering a clearer image without them physically leaving the courtroom, pending judicial approval.
While the potential benefits of using VR to enhance jurors’ understanding of crime scenes are evident, legal experts stress the importance of maintaining control over the VR content presented to jurors. Thomas Ross, KC, a specialist in homicide cases, cautiously supports the use of VR but emphasizes the need for lawyers to influence the content presented to jurors.
The decision to incorporate VR in courtrooms ultimately lies with the Crown and the defence, as it involves the presentation of evidence in court, as clarified by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service.
Amidst these discussions, it is important to note that the proposal for VR in courtrooms coincides with the Scottish Government’s consideration of a pilot scheme for juryless rape trials. However, concerns have been raised by defence lawyers, who fear that such a system could compromise the right to a fair trial. The government’s rationale is based on the potential impact of ‘rape myths’ on jurors’ perceptions, which could prejudice their view of the complainant.
As deliberations continue, the potential use of VR in courtrooms raises various legal and ethical considerations. Its implementation would require careful evaluation and oversight by legal authorities and policymakers.
In conclusion, the consideration of using virtual reality to allow jurors to virtually visit crime scenes while in court represents a potential advancement in the legal system. However, its implementation must be carefully considered to ensure alignment with principles of fairness and justice as technology continues to evolve.