The Dispute Between Lawmakers and Engineers Over Road Construction Material

An intriguing development occurred on Thursday during the House of Representatives investigative hearing on the use of concrete technology for road construction, leading to a clash between members of the House and the Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE) that caused a commotion at the venue.

The dispute arose when Akin Alabi, the Chairman of the Committee on Works, and Emeka Eze, the Chairman Board of Trustees of the NSE, engaged in a contentious discussion about the House’s authority to legislate on the adoption of concrete technology. The House had commenced an investigation into the proposed use of concrete technology for federal roads following a motion by Khadijah Abba-Ibrahim in October, a move that was met with opposition from the NSE.

Mr Eze, speaking on behalf of the NSE, expressed the opinion that the House lacks the legal jurisdiction to scrutinize technical matters related to the adoption of concrete technology. He criticized the investigation as “inappropriate,” suggesting that the executive branch should be responsible for determining the suitable material for road construction. Conversely, Mr Alabi asserted the House’s prerogative to pose inquiries, emphasizing that the National Assembly provides funding for the ministry and its projects.

The ongoing conflict stems from the advocacy of the Minister of Works, David Umahi, for the use of concrete in road construction, a potential departure from the prevalent use of asphalt technology in the country. This has caused friction within the construction industry due to the associated cost implications. Notwithstanding, the minister remains steadfast in enforcing compliance with these proposed changes among contractors.

In conclusion, the disagreement between the House of Representatives and the Nigerian Society of Engineers regarding the use of concrete technology for road construction represents a pivotal moment in the construction industry. The divergence of viewpoints on this matter underscores the intricacies surrounding technological advancements in infrastructure development. As discussions and deliberations persist, it is imperative for the involved parties to seek a middle ground that prioritizes the safety and efficiency of road infrastructure in the country.